Kelly added the importance of providing bats with bed and breakfast, by including suitable green infrastructure and landscape plans.
Our Bats in Buildings Briefing this week was led by Kelly Gunnell from The Bat Conservation Trust and our own bat ecologist, Dr. Sarah Yarwood-Lovett. Twenty attendees from local authorities, architects and environmental organisations learned about the importance and complexity of bat surveys and bat mitigation.
‘Bat poo’ was a major element of the Briefing as its appearance can help differentiate bat species!
Attendees learnt how different species, have different roosting requirements, which informs design of size, materials and shape of replacement roost sites. The greater and lesser horseshoe bats, for example, prefer an ‘L’-shaped loft . BCT is currently researching the success of bat boxes as it is suspected that their use may be restricted to the more common species of bat. There is concern that boxes are installed without consultation and not always sited in optimal positions to encourage use by roosting bats.
Sarah emphasised the importance of commissioning ecologists to survey a site at the earliest opportunity, because different bat species can roost almost anywhere, including in tiny crevices, making it very difficult to rule out if bats are present. If bats are present, the process of surveys, applying for a bat EPSM licence*, designing mitigation and implementing it, can delay a project if this hasn’t been programmed in at an early stage. Kelly added the importance of providing bats with bed and breakfast, by including suitable green infrastructure and landscape plans.
*EPSM – European Protected Species Mitigation licence, obtained from Natural England.